This example is designed to help understand how to use PIA to analyse the scenario of buying an investment property in the name of a self-managed superannuation fund.
Property details:
Let us begin with the property described in Example 1. This was a new Queensland property (three bedroom brick residence on large block) purchased for $465,000 and rented for $470 per week. Apart from standard rental management and letting fees, rental expenses included rates ($1850), insurance ($750), maintenance ($900), pest control ($150) and travel costs for property inspections ($450). The original building construction cost was $230,000 and the purchase price included $26,000 worth of fixtures and fittings. The purchase costs included normal State Government stamp duty and $1250 solicitor’s fees to cover the conveyancing.
Loan details:
Principal and interest finance was arranged at 7.2% over 30 years to cover all costs, including purchase and loan costs. The total loan costs include a fixed establishment fee of $500, no mortgagee insurance, and the remainder of the loan costs are as per the program defaults.
Investor details:
The investor’s annual salary was $85,000 per year, his spouse’s was $35,000 and they wish to purchase the property in the name of their Self-Managed Super Fund (SMSF) into which they make an annual contribution of 9.5% ($11,400) of their combined salaries.
What if:
The annual growth rate for the property was 5% and the annual inflation rate 2%.
Now as we are interested in whether or not there will be sufficient cash in the SMSF to meet any shortfall, click the check box to display the Annual Cash Surplus at the bottom of the Investment Analysis spreadsheet.
The annual cash surplus is negative (-10,559 in the first year) so there would be insufficient cash in the fund to service the shortfall. Click on the figures in the Annual cash surplus row to see how they are derived.
The first option might be to
change the loan type from principal and interest to interest-only. However,
while this reduces the deficit from 10,559 to 5,990, the fund would still be in
deficit.
The most obvious option, if they can afford it, is simply to make extra
contributions to the fund. Re-open the Personal Details dialog and add 11,159
as Other income.
For the SMSF to meet its cash flow shortfall, it would require annual contributions of at least $21,959.
An alternative to making greater cash contributions would
be to provide a significant initial cash deposit. This can be estimated most
easily by trial and error. Firstly Undo the additional cash contributions and
enter a figure between zero and 251,985 (the cash neutral investment required
for a neutral cash flow), say 100k. The Annual cash surplus is still
negative (-2,414 in year 1). Try something higher, say 150k. This
would be more than sufficient as there is a cash surplus of $1,659 in the first
year and it increase with time. With a couple more intermediate trials, a
figure of 130k as a cash deposit would still result in the SMSF meeting its
cash flows.
Under current Australian tax rules, there would be no
capital gains tax if the property were sold once the couple were in retirement
mode. Generate the Investment Analysis report (Menu: Report/Investment
Analysis) which will reveal an equity after-sale of $427,764 at the end of 10
years, representing an after-sale return of 8.61%.